Utopian Thinking
This isn’t a criticism, or maybe it is, it strikes me that no matter who you are, nor what ideology, it seems to always come down to making the perfect society, and if you go down this path,
than x happens and all shall be perfect and there will be a nirvana forever and forever. This is rather common, but rarely do I ever
find an ideology that actually accepts as its outcome something less than
perfect. This is my preference by the by, my utopian idea, involves something I
call the multiplicity, a system which incorporates all systems, and doesn’t
even try to incorporate the perfect anything. You see the problem with the
perfect system, or the great utopia, is that it always presumes that there will
always be one solution that is perfect, one society that will be perfect, and
frankly that doesn’t really jive with reality.
Reality in the human world is a patchwork of imperfect solutions, and
represent on their most basic level imperfect adaptations to a constantly
changing environment. If, to give a
example, democracy were the best
form of government, then why isn’t it
used more commonly, why do we see spatially across the world so many non
democracies, temporarily it’s even worse, how come so many of the world’s governments have been historically
monarchies? If it were the best form of government, then it seems logical that
it would have been used far more often than it has.
There are many other utopian ideas, that this one solution
will solve all problems, but the reality is that any one solution is only a
temporary solution at best. This is because it represents a purely temporary
adaptation to a purely temporary environmental condition. Perhaps that is the
problem, people think that their purpose is to make a ‘perfect’ society or come
up with the perfect something, but the reality is always far from perfect. The common refrain to such is a response is
well you didn’t do this or that, and that is why my perfect thing or perfect
society didn’t work. Never does it ever come to perhaps the perfect anything is
a fantasy, borne out of a human mind that tries (but never succeeds) to play
tricks with reality. This inability to accept a less than perfect something
comes from also I suspect an inability to process difference. If a difference
exists then it must be imperfect, this conflicts with ego’s preference for
something utopian.
So to take away from this piece, you should actually accept
that there is no utopian anything, that you must by necessity try and find a
imperfect solution, because there will never be a perfect anything.
No comments:
Post a Comment